Letters from Leavers

By -

I recently came across a new website, and I have become convinced of its value for those in church leadership, and for those who would theologically advise them. This site is full of the testimony of those who have left the church, and I’m not talking about leaving any one particular church (although there are some stories about that) – I’m talking about those who have left THE church, Christianity as a whole. Reading some of these stories, I was struck by the penetrating thought – “If theology cannot address these problems, its not doing its job.”

Now, lest you worry that I have turned my back on my disavowal of apologetics, I haven’t. But, reading these stories I was struck by the utter inability of many theological systems (both those I have studies and those which I have at one point or another held) to provide resources for pastoral care in relation to these questions. Dealing with these kinds of issues from within the church and Christian theology (remember, these people were all ‘in’ at some point, and were not retained) is of utmost import. We don’t need to cast around outside of Christian theology to find support for our faith (that kind of apologetics is, I think, a waste of time). But, we ought to be able to speak to these needs if for no other reason than that we must affirm that God is able to speak to these needs.

In any case, I highly recommend Letters from Leavers to your attention. They have an RSS feed, and I suggest subscribing. And, for those of you interested in practical theology, or at least the practical aspects of systematic theology (there certainly are practical aspects!), look through this stuff and ask yourself if some of them wouldn’t make for great final exam questions.

Comments

Lee said…
Dear WTM,

I want to start off by saying that, although I do not necessarily agree with your stance on the matters at hand, I do have the up most respect for you. It is not often I come across a Christian of actual intelligence. I tried to visit the link given and it would not let me see the page. Perhaps you typed it in wrong?
I am in no way shape or form a theologist like yourself. However, I AM a former theist so maybe I can help you out a little. Personally I think the problem is not with the faith, but the church. The way the church is sometimes paraded around like a circus is enough to make anyone sick. Not to mention the vast amounts of scientific discoveries (archaeological and genetic) that have occurred over the last 10 years. Once again I have not read these letters, but I don't think they're leaving the faith as a whole. Even if they did I highly doubt they would even admit to such a thing.
Sorry this wasn't very detailed. It's early and im still tired. I enjoyed reading this very much. I would like to hear back from you with any opinions/arguments. Thank you for your time.
February 25, 2007 7:37 AM
W. Travis McMaken said…
Hi Smurf,

I’m glad that you have jumped into the conversation, and I appreciate the kind things you have to say about me. As for the link, it seems that the site is down this morning, which is a shame. But, hopefully it will come back up soon.

As for your other comments, I can see what you mean. I think that a lot of the problems are caused not by faith itself or even by theology, but by the behavior of Christians and those in church leadership. This is a very sad reality.

Of course, a lot of things go into establishing the conditions for this very sad reality, and I think that bad theology is one of them, and – being a theologian – I tend to be optimistic about the improvements that could be brought about if more Christians and leaders in the church sunk their teeth into good theology. I am very hopeful that good theology can make people more ‘Christian’ as well as strengthen their faith.

You are certainly right that there are people represented on the ‘Letters from Leavers’ site that are not giving up some form of ‘faith’, but only the Christian forms that they have come into contact with. But I tend to think that Christian faith happens to be the important thing (I am a Christian theologian after all), even though I know some would disagree with me on that.

For the record, I am not disturbed by any of the discoveries of modern science, nor do I wish to dispute with the scientific community about their research. I am a theologian, not a scientist, after all.
February 25, 2007 7:53 AM
Tim Bower said…
WTM,

Thanks for linking to us and for recognizing the challenge that awaits those that are willing to read the letters we are hosting.

The site was down for a few hours (until about 7 am this morning) but it is back up and running now. We would love to hear any suggestions or comments you have regarding the site or any theological reflection you have as you read the letters.

Thanks again,

Tim Bower
LFl
February 26, 2007 2:21 AM
Post a Comment

Popular Posts

So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?

By -
Image
Every now and then I am asked for advice about studying Karl Barth. So, I thought that I would share some of my standard advice here. But, before I do that, let me just say that I am by no means a Barth expert as compared to the people whose books I will mention below. I would be thrilled to find myself in their league one day, but as of yet that remains a distant dream. Still, I have been reading Barth for long enough, and under the supervision of a number of the scholars that I will mention below, that I think I can provide a decent orientation. I have never read Karl Barth before. Which of his books should I read first? Barth’s most famous work is the monumental 13-volume Church Dogmatics . Reading the CD with understanding is not an easy thing, so you definitely do NOT want to start here. Luckily, there are two smaller works by Barth that serve as helpful introductions to his work. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction - Based on the lectures that Barth delivered duri
Keep reading

So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer?

By -
Image
"I fear that Christians who stand with only one leg upon earth also stand with only one leg in heaven." "The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from everyday Christian life in community…may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; for in the poor sister or brother, Christ is knocking at the door." "Since ethical thinking in terms of realms is overcome by faith in the revelation of the ultimate reality in Jesus Christ . . . there is no real Christian existence outside the reality of the world." "People who reject their bodies reject their existence before God the Creator." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer Prelude Andreas Steinhoff [Attribution], via Wikimedia Commons I envisioned having a lot of time for blogging this summer, but that simply has not been the case - the last month has been a crazy one, to say the least. For two weeks, I was working at a theology summer camp of sorts, the Duke Youth Academy, and s
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 1, Day 5

By -
“You Wonder Where the Spirit Went”: Jenson and Barth on the Hiddenness of God By Peter Kline I am entering into a conversation that Jenson has already begun with Barth. In a constructive essay on the hiddenness of God (Jenson 2000), Jenson considers Barth’s position on the matter only to find it lacking. I want to explore why Jenson has problems with Barth on this issue, as well think critically about his constructive alternative. I will suggest that Jenson is only partly right in his diagnosis of Barth; he in fact overlooks the heart of Barth’s teaching on divine hiddenness. The reason is that he looks in the wrong place for Barth’s pneumatology. Jenson can’t find the Spirit in Barth not because the Spirit isn’t there, but because the Spirit is hidden . These considerations will open out into a comparison of Barth and Jenson on the logic of revelation. By “logic” I mean: what is discourse about God’s revealedness and hiddenness supposed to accomplish? Part I Jenson focuses his a
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 3, Day 1

By -
On the Monstrosity of Christ : Karl Barth in Conversation with Slavoj Žižek & John Milbank By Paul Dafydd Jones For a while, I hoped to frame this conversation in terms of a dramatic interchange – something along the lines of “A Slovenian philosopher, a British theologian, and a Swiss dogmatician walk into a bar…” Alongside an eye-wateringly hip assemblage of cinematic references, literary allusions, and comedic scenes – my early favorites being when Barth imagines a young adult novel, entitled Are you there God? It’s me, Žižek , and when Milbank waxes poetic about the Twilight movies – I wanted to engage some topics that would likely receive attention, were the authors to meet for drinks. Primarily, I envisioned an intense discussion of the logos asarkos and the logos ensarkos , with Milbank talking up the former category, Barth emphasizing the latter, and Žižek asking whether recent debates are but symptoms of secret puzzle, embedded in the Church Dogmatics – a puzzle that
Keep reading

Karl Barth on Hell, the Devil, Demons, and Universalism – A Florilegium

By -
Image
You know, all the most interesting topics. Although Barth often confessed that he didn’t find these questions particularly interesting. At best they might draw sideways glances, as it were, as one travels the theological road. But I found a number of places in the records of Barth’s later conversations that I thought folks might find interesting, so I’ve collected them here. And if you aren’t familiar with the term “florilegium,” here you go ! All these texts are from the first volume of Barth in Conversation , with pages numbers given in parentheses along the way. As usual, italics are in the text and bold is mine. Hell “Now we come to hell. You shouldn’t laugh! There is nothing to laugh at! What does hell mean? I think hell means to be in the place where you are once fore all damned and lost without ceasing to exist, without losing the image of God, being what you are but being damned and lost, separated from God, whose creature you are, separated also from your neighbor, from
Keep reading