Free Study Guide for "Our God Loves Justice"

By -

As you know, gentle readers, lately I've been bringing all my social media resources to bear in an effort to make the case for why my fellow theological and religious studies academics should assign my recent book--Our God Loves Justice: An Introduction to Helmut Gollwitzer (Fortress, 2017)--in their classes. All the same arguments hold true for pastors looking for resources for leader training and other pedagogical resources, and for anyone with a theological existence who is part of a theology reading group, etc. But I'm especially keen to get this work into the hands of theological students in the college, university, and seminary contexts because I believe it can help them come to a radically different understanding of the intersection between Christianity and politics than one usually finds in the United States today. As Shannon Smythe, who teaches theology at Seattle Pacific University and who has endorsed the book, puts it:
"This is a challenging and hopeful book that answers the questions my students are asking!"
You may also remember that I posted 10 reasons (well, 11 really once you count the bonus reason) why you should assign the book in your class. I also provided the link to the Fortress press physical desk copy request form, which has always been one of my favorite forms.

The good folks at Fortress, however, had the excellent idea of preparing a...

...FREE STUDY GUIDE...


...for OGLJ to help make it even easier to incorporate into a pedagogical setting. As you no doubt suspect, gentle readers, and would anticipate through long association, I was more than happy to supply such a resource. I now make that resource available to you all here at DET. It is also available in .pdf on the OGLJ Fortress webpage and among my Humanities Commons CORE deposits. The guide, as you will see below very shortly, includes three clusters of questions for each of the book's chapters as well as for each of the two translated works from Gollwitzer included in the appendices.

I hope that you find this helpful and that it makes OGLJ more accessible! Who knows? Perhaps you will find uses for it of which I have not yet conceived. And just as a teaser, stay tuned for more tweetable reasons why you should adopt OGLJ in your classes...


Our God Loves Justice:
Study Questions


Prepared by W. Travis McMaken
with Kaitlyn Centini

 Chapter 1: Reading Helmut Gollwitzer in America
  1. How do we normally think of the relationship between things like patriotism, socialism, and the working class? Have things always been that way?
  2. Is there a connection between fundamentalist Christianity and capitalist fundamentalism? What role have fundamentalist institutions like Moody Bible Institute played in legitimizing and perpetuating capitalist orthodoxy?
  3. What does it say about the unity of American civic and religious identity in the 20th century that the phrase “one nation under God” was added to the Pledge of Allegiance, and “In God we Trust” was added to US currency? Was this Christianity influencing politics, politics influencing Christianity, or something more complicated?
Chapter 2: Grace upon Grace: Helmut Gollwitzer’s Life and Work
  1. Is theology boring? Are there more or less boring kinds of theology? What makes theology boring or otherwise? What was it about Dialectical Theology that blew “the dust of boredom” (p. 22) off theology for Gollwitzer?
  2. Gollwitzer describes socialism as “a predicate of the Gospel” in Karl Barth’s thought (p. 28). What does that mean? Why might Barth (and Gollwitzer) make this claim?
  3. What part of Gollwitzer’s life story resonates most with you? Inspires you? Worries you?
Chapter 3: Gollwitzer’s Political Theology
  1. Dialectical Theology affirms God’s nonobjectifiability. What does this mean? What consequences does it have for doing theology, and especially for political theology?
  2. What is the logical relationship between Dialectical Theology and contextual theologies? Liberation theologies? Political theologies?
  3. All theology is political for Gollwitzer. Why might we agree or disagree? What are some common responses to such a claim? How might Gollwitzer answer those responses?
Chapter 4: Gollwitzer’s Theological Politics
  1. Gollwitzer’s relation to democratic socialism changed and developed over time, before his experiences in the 1960s helped to decisively define his views. Do any parts of this story resonate with you? In which of Gollwitzer’s stages of development do you find yourself?
  2. Gollwitzer understands that it is impossible to have true democracy without socialism. How does this align or contrast with prevailing notions about democracy in America today? Which vision for democracy is more compelling: Gollwitzer’s or the contemporary American version?
  3. What are some ways that Christians have traditionally thought about engaging in violence? What does it mean to say “all revolutionary violence is counterviolence” (p. 144)? How does analysis of economic theories such as socialism and capitalism dovetail with the question of violence in contexts of war and revolution?
Chapter 5: Church and Confession
  1. Gollwitzer wants “a dangerous church because a church that is not dangerous is no help at all” (p. 151). What does this mean? What is “Christendom,” and how does it fit in here?
  2. What does it mean for Gollwitzer to think the church as an event, and as “a political event” (p. 164). How does this align or contrast with how we normally think of the church? What consequences might follow from Gollwitzer’s ecclesiology?
  3. What is a status confessionis? Why might someone think that the church in North American—indeed, in all the global North—finds itself in such a condition? Do you agree or disagree?
Appendix 1: Must a Christian Be a Socialist?
  1. Gollwitzer argues that a Christian must be a socialist. Why? What does Gollwitzer mean when he says that a Christian “must” be a socialist? What sort of necessity does he mean, and what sort doesn’t he mean?
  2. Do you agree with Gollwitzer that a Christian must be a socialist? Why or why not?
  3. Does Gollwitzer think that being a socialist means that there are no further political decisions that you have to make? What does he mean when he talks about socialism forming a “channel” (p. 178)?
Appendix 2: Why Am I, as a Christian, a Socialist? Theses
  1. What does it mean to be a socialist, and what are some of the difficulties that Gollwitzer identified for socialists in his own day? Are these still difficulties for socialists today? Are there any further difficulties that have developed since Gollwitzer wrote his theses?
  2. What does Gollwitzer identify as “the most important question today” for Christians (p. 193)? Do you agree? Why or why not?
  3. Why do people become socialists, according to Gollwitzer? Why do Christians become socialists? How does Gollwitzer’s comment about the “direction and orientation” of the gospel fit in here (p. 194)?

==================================


Subscribe to Die Evangelischen Theologen

Comments

VermontPastor said…
Thank you. An excellent study help for the local church pastor!
March 10, 2018 9:19 PM
Post a Comment

Popular Posts

So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer?

By -
Image
"I fear that Christians who stand with only one leg upon earth also stand with only one leg in heaven." "The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from everyday Christian life in community…may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; for in the poor sister or brother, Christ is knocking at the door." "Since ethical thinking in terms of realms is overcome by faith in the revelation of the ultimate reality in Jesus Christ . . . there is no real Christian existence outside the reality of the world." "People who reject their bodies reject their existence before God the Creator." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer Prelude Andreas Steinhoff [Attribution], via Wikimedia Commons I envisioned having a lot of time for blogging this summer, but that simply has not been the case - the last month has been a crazy one, to say the least. For two weeks, I was working at a theology summer camp of sorts, the Duke Youth Academy, and s...
Keep reading

So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?

By -
Image
Every now and then I am asked for advice about studying Karl Barth. So, I thought that I would share some of my standard advice here. But, before I do that, let me just say that I am by no means a Barth expert as compared to the people whose books I will mention below. I would be thrilled to find myself in their league one day, but as of yet that remains a distant dream. Still, I have been reading Barth for long enough, and under the supervision of a number of the scholars that I will mention below, that I think I can provide a decent orientation. I have never read Karl Barth before. Which of his books should I read first? Barth’s most famous work is the monumental 13-volume Church Dogmatics . Reading the CD with understanding is not an easy thing, so you definitely do NOT want to start here. Luckily, there are two smaller works by Barth that serve as helpful introductions to his work. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction - Based on the lectures that Barth delivered duri...
Keep reading

Karl Barth on Hell, the Devil, Demons, and Universalism – A Florilegium

By -
Image
You know, all the most interesting topics. Although Barth often confessed that he didn’t find these questions particularly interesting. At best they might draw sideways glances, as it were, as one travels the theological road. But I found a number of places in the records of Barth’s later conversations that I thought folks might find interesting, so I’ve collected them here. And if you aren’t familiar with the term “florilegium,” here you go ! All these texts are from the first volume of Barth in Conversation , with pages numbers given in parentheses along the way. As usual, italics are in the text and bold is mine. Hell “Now we come to hell. You shouldn’t laugh! There is nothing to laugh at! What does hell mean? I think hell means to be in the place where you are once fore all damned and lost without ceasing to exist, without losing the image of God, being what you are but being damned and lost, separated from God, whose creature you are, separated also from your neighbor, from...
Keep reading

George Hunsinger’s gloss of the Christ Hymn in Philippians 2

By -
Image
I’ve been reading George Hunsinger’s (my doktorvater , for anyone who might be new around here) entry in the Brazos Theoloical Commentary on the Bible series on Philippians. Anyone who has studied with George will find this book to be a compendium and application of many of his most characteristic and beloved analytical tools and patterns, and I’ve been enjoying it immensely. But one of the things that really stood out to me was how he glossed the so-called “Christ hymn” of Philippians 2. George Hunsinger, Philippians , Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible (Grand Rapids: BrazosPress, 2020). The gloss that Hunsinger provides is not a historical-critical interpretation. Rather, it is an ecclesial, ecumenical, and theological interpretation that attempts to fill in the blanks for how to understand this proto-liturgical formulation in light of the later formulations of the ecumenical creeds. In order to achieve this gloss, Hunsinger engages in “ecclesial hermeneutics” and makes “...
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 3, Day 1

By -
On the Monstrosity of Christ : Karl Barth in Conversation with Slavoj Žižek & John Milbank By Paul Dafydd Jones For a while, I hoped to frame this conversation in terms of a dramatic interchange – something along the lines of “A Slovenian philosopher, a British theologian, and a Swiss dogmatician walk into a bar…” Alongside an eye-wateringly hip assemblage of cinematic references, literary allusions, and comedic scenes – my early favorites being when Barth imagines a young adult novel, entitled Are you there God? It’s me, Žižek , and when Milbank waxes poetic about the Twilight movies – I wanted to engage some topics that would likely receive attention, were the authors to meet for drinks. Primarily, I envisioned an intense discussion of the logos asarkos and the logos ensarkos , with Milbank talking up the former category, Barth emphasizing the latter, and Žižek asking whether recent debates are but symptoms of secret puzzle, embedded in the Church Dogmatics – a puzzle that...
Keep reading