Well, hello there...

By -
Well, hello there, gentle reader. Long time no see. It is I, your intrepid theo-blogger. Rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. The truth is, I have been buried under a pile of work here at Lindenwood, teaching 120+ students about world religions and the history of Christianity. In fact, last week was mid-term week. As if that wasn’t enough, I had the incredible foresight to assign a paper due at about the same time. Suffice it to say, I spent the last week or so grading until my fingers bled and I began bleeding from my ears. On top of that, each and every of the incredibly few spare moments I’m able to carve out has been directed toward getting my dissertation ready to defend (it’s getting close, cross your fingers!). On top of that even further, I’m currently working on a presentation on “sacred space” for a panel discussion and Q&A on that topic next week here on campus (if you are in the St. Louis area and want to attend, contact me and I’ll send you the flier).

To make a long story short, even though I’ve just told you the long version, I’ve been too busy to blog. You have no idea how ashamed I am to admit this, but I simply cannot deny it further. As a result, you will simply have to theologically stimulate yourself for the foreseeable future. Of course, I would not leave you bereft, dear brethren. I offer you the archives here at DET as a an impetus to your own reflection. Dig into them. See what’s there. In fact, try to find something embarrassing in there that I’ve forgotten about (and then tell me about it so I can spirit it away…). Who knows, you might even want to leave a comment and stoke the embers of a discussion grown cold. In fact, I’ll make it easy for you by listing a few things you might want to look at:


So, there you have it. I’ll leave you to work on all that for a while, but I promise to think of you from time to time, and to return to regular posting as soon as possible. Until then, to steal the immortal words that we sort of suspect might reflect something like a thing Oliver Cromwell once said, “Put your trust in God, and keep your powder dry.”

==================================

Comments

Bob MacDonald said…
I think your old post may not accept comments any more.

Thanks for posting the link to it. I must have missed it in the summer. You write of theology as ... the church’s critical reflection ... of the good news of Jesus Christ
then more generally ... theology is the attempt to describe with conceptual care ... our relationships – with each other, with creation, and with God.

The more general statement allows me to consider what theology is for Israel, or for Islam. I don't, however, want to add an adjective to theology. I want to consider what theology is for those who are of the 'great assembly'. (psalms 1.5, 22.17, 74.2 et al.) These are not necessarily of Christendom. While I remain one who is in Christ and brought in as a Gentile through his death, I am not clear that I am allowed to define theology only through this unique Anointed one through whose death I learn by the Spirit of the anointing given to Israel and shared by all who read the words of the TNK.

Also, how can I frame theology in ways that allow me to speak to the atheist, the Muslim, the Hindu, or the Buddhist without in anyway compromising the inclusiveness already in the TNK. After all why did Paul write Romans the way he did and use so much of the TNK to support his inclusive arguments.

I am wary of the exclusive claim implied by adjectives. I don't intend to water down the truth but I equally don't want to make it support only my own confession.
October 12, 2011 7:06 PM
W. Travis McMaken said…
Bob,

The comments work, but there is a comment moderation system for older posts to help catch spam. Sorry for being slow on the click to let your comment through. But I'll just answer you here since you re-posted.

As a Christian theologian, I think that theology needs to be controlled by the particularity of Jesus Christ. But his particularity is not an exclusive particularity, but an inclusive one. This is one of the things I like so much about Barth. So I would advocate the sort of theological dialog you are interested with other religions, especially the Abrahamic faiths, but that dialog should be pursued from a solid foundation in Christ's (inclusive) particularity.

I think the key for Christians when engaging other religions is to recognize that Christianity is also a religion; it is only in the event of God's gracious address that religion stops being a merely human phenomenon, and that address can come through a dead dog, a flute concerto, pure land Buddhism, Taoism, atheism - you name it.
October 12, 2011 9:09 PM
Bob MacDonald said…
Thank you Travis - a good reply. Have you any thoughts on how the theology of the psalms would fit into the theology in John? I feel that Hebrews and Paul's Romans fit the hope and the work that is in the psalms, but I haven't thought so much on John with respect to the psalms. Maybe some day a post will appear...
October 12, 2011 9:24 PM
W. Travis McMaken said…
I haven't thought through that with specific reference to John...interesting question, though.
October 12, 2011 9:52 PM
Timothy R. Butler said…
I wish I wasn't going to be at presbytery when the Coffee Conversation was occurring! Those are always such interesting events and I'd like to hear what you have to say on the subject.

I hope some of my students write helpful response papers on the event...
October 13, 2011 8:30 PM
Bobby Grow said…
I read the one on Knox, and I liked ;-).

I think you should re-read Forde's book; you've inspired me to do the same.

If you need a full time TA (with a hefty salary, full medical benefits and a housing allowance included); I am available and have plenty of TA experience ;-).
October 16, 2011 1:01 AM
W. Travis McMaken said…
Bobby, if it were the olden days, you'd be in St Charles even now. I could use a good assistant...
October 17, 2011 11:04 PM
Post a Comment

Popular Posts

So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?

By -
Image
Every now and then I am asked for advice about studying Karl Barth. So, I thought that I would share some of my standard advice here. But, before I do that, let me just say that I am by no means a Barth expert as compared to the people whose books I will mention below. I would be thrilled to find myself in their league one day, but as of yet that remains a distant dream. Still, I have been reading Barth for long enough, and under the supervision of a number of the scholars that I will mention below, that I think I can provide a decent orientation. I have never read Karl Barth before. Which of his books should I read first? Barth’s most famous work is the monumental 13-volume Church Dogmatics . Reading the CD with understanding is not an easy thing, so you definitely do NOT want to start here. Luckily, there are two smaller works by Barth that serve as helpful introductions to his work. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction - Based on the lectures that Barth delivered duri
Keep reading

So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer?

By -
Image
"I fear that Christians who stand with only one leg upon earth also stand with only one leg in heaven." "The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from everyday Christian life in community…may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; for in the poor sister or brother, Christ is knocking at the door." "Since ethical thinking in terms of realms is overcome by faith in the revelation of the ultimate reality in Jesus Christ . . . there is no real Christian existence outside the reality of the world." "People who reject their bodies reject their existence before God the Creator." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer Prelude Andreas Steinhoff [Attribution], via Wikimedia Commons I envisioned having a lot of time for blogging this summer, but that simply has not been the case - the last month has been a crazy one, to say the least. For two weeks, I was working at a theology summer camp of sorts, the Duke Youth Academy, and s
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 1, Day 5

By -
“You Wonder Where the Spirit Went”: Jenson and Barth on the Hiddenness of God By Peter Kline I am entering into a conversation that Jenson has already begun with Barth. In a constructive essay on the hiddenness of God (Jenson 2000), Jenson considers Barth’s position on the matter only to find it lacking. I want to explore why Jenson has problems with Barth on this issue, as well think critically about his constructive alternative. I will suggest that Jenson is only partly right in his diagnosis of Barth; he in fact overlooks the heart of Barth’s teaching on divine hiddenness. The reason is that he looks in the wrong place for Barth’s pneumatology. Jenson can’t find the Spirit in Barth not because the Spirit isn’t there, but because the Spirit is hidden . These considerations will open out into a comparison of Barth and Jenson on the logic of revelation. By “logic” I mean: what is discourse about God’s revealedness and hiddenness supposed to accomplish? Part I Jenson focuses his a
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 3, Day 1

By -
On the Monstrosity of Christ : Karl Barth in Conversation with Slavoj Žižek & John Milbank By Paul Dafydd Jones For a while, I hoped to frame this conversation in terms of a dramatic interchange – something along the lines of “A Slovenian philosopher, a British theologian, and a Swiss dogmatician walk into a bar…” Alongside an eye-wateringly hip assemblage of cinematic references, literary allusions, and comedic scenes – my early favorites being when Barth imagines a young adult novel, entitled Are you there God? It’s me, Žižek , and when Milbank waxes poetic about the Twilight movies – I wanted to engage some topics that would likely receive attention, were the authors to meet for drinks. Primarily, I envisioned an intense discussion of the logos asarkos and the logos ensarkos , with Milbank talking up the former category, Barth emphasizing the latter, and Žižek asking whether recent debates are but symptoms of secret puzzle, embedded in the Church Dogmatics – a puzzle that
Keep reading

Karl Barth on Hell, the Devil, Demons, and Universalism – A Florilegium

By -
Image
You know, all the most interesting topics. Although Barth often confessed that he didn’t find these questions particularly interesting. At best they might draw sideways glances, as it were, as one travels the theological road. But I found a number of places in the records of Barth’s later conversations that I thought folks might find interesting, so I’ve collected them here. And if you aren’t familiar with the term “florilegium,” here you go ! All these texts are from the first volume of Barth in Conversation , with pages numbers given in parentheses along the way. As usual, italics are in the text and bold is mine. Hell “Now we come to hell. You shouldn’t laugh! There is nothing to laugh at! What does hell mean? I think hell means to be in the place where you are once fore all damned and lost without ceasing to exist, without losing the image of God, being what you are but being damned and lost, separated from God, whose creature you are, separated also from your neighbor, from
Keep reading