Top 10 Posts from the Second Half of 2012

By -
Happy New Year! Well, kind of anyway. I tend to think through the calendar based on academic semesters, which means that the New Year does not mentally begin for me until our January Term starts on Monday. But since I’m sure that at least some of you, gentle readers, go by the vulgar calendar, I might as well post this now.

Those of you with elephantine memories might recall this post, which highlighted the top 10 posts from the first half of the year. As I noted then, I would remind you that the stats on which this ranking is based do not factor the amount of traffic a post received as part of the front page, e.g., on the day it was posted and those immediately following. It can account only for traffic dealing directly with that post.

So, without further ado…

  1. Topping the list in the second half of the year just as it did in the first half, is Why I Think…Ben Myers Isn’t Quite Right About TF Torrance. It is certainly gratifying that this post continues to draw significant traffic.
  2. This slot is also a repeat from the first half of the year: So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?
  3. Ah, yes. Here we have a new entry, much like the one lodged in the second slot - contributor Brandy Daniels with So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer? This is a very worthwhile post if you are considering picking up some Bonhoeffer for a rainy Sunday afternoon . . . or . . . for any time really.
  4. My self-proclaimed “diatribe” entitled Science, Theology, and None-of-the-Above (i.e., “creationism”): On the recent flap between Bill Nye and Ken Ham occupies this fourth slot. I’ll admit, I just got a burr in my bonnet on this one. But I did receive some interesting FB messages as a result . . .
  5. Another frequently high achieving post here, having taken the third slot in the first half of the year: Types of Theology. I must have simply landed a solid, search-engine friendly title on this one.
  6. I am very happy to see that this post is getting enough attention to make this list as I think it deals with some important contemporary theological debates, even if mostly obliquely or suggestively rather than extensively. Be sure to read this one if you haven’t yet done so: Review of Oliver Crisp's Retrieving Doctrine: Essays in Reformed Theology.
  7. I was very happy to see this post break out of the pack. It was written by my good friend, colleague, and theologically-conjoined twin, David Congdon, for the 2008 KBBC, and it is well worth your time: Demythologizing the Divide between Barth and Bultmann.
  8. This post was fun to write for a number of reasons, and I’m glad some folk are reading it. It is partially a playful appropriation of someone not usually counted as a theological ally, and partially a vent for frustration at the current state of Anglophone theology. For more than that, you’ll have to read it yourself: In Defense of Theological Blogging and Belligerence, with Christopher Hitchens.
  9. Wow! You folk are actually reading one of my boring historical posts! Well, I guess there’s a first time for everything. ;-) It isn’t high on the list, but I’m glad it charted: Calvin to Bullinger on Luther. I came across the material in this post while preparing for the Reformation course I taught last semester. It turned out to be a pretty good class (if I do say so myself).
  10. Last but not least, we have a post from another DET contributor, this time it’s Derek Maris. In this post Derek offers a juicy tidbit that integrates his interests in both Barth and Moltmann: Moltmann on Barth Research.

Honorable mention - This post was only 1 visit short of tying for the #10 slot, so I thought that I should include it: Migliore on Barth, Bultmann, Pannenberg, and Moltmann on the Resurrection.

There you have it – the top 10 posts of July through December, 2012. I think that it has been a relatively slow year here at DET, especially the second half of the year. But I’m hoping to return to form in 2013 and I hope that some of the other contributors will continue to step up and provide quality material for us all to ponder. So, as always, stay tuned!

==================================

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?

By -
Image
Every now and then I am asked for advice about studying Karl Barth. So, I thought that I would share some of my standard advice here. But, before I do that, let me just say that I am by no means a Barth expert as compared to the people whose books I will mention below. I would be thrilled to find myself in their league one day, but as of yet that remains a distant dream. Still, I have been reading Barth for long enough, and under the supervision of a number of the scholars that I will mention below, that I think I can provide a decent orientation. I have never read Karl Barth before. Which of his books should I read first? Barth’s most famous work is the monumental 13-volume Church Dogmatics . Reading the CD with understanding is not an easy thing, so you definitely do NOT want to start here. Luckily, there are two smaller works by Barth that serve as helpful introductions to his work. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction - Based on the lectures that Barth delivered duri
Keep reading

So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer?

By -
Image
"I fear that Christians who stand with only one leg upon earth also stand with only one leg in heaven." "The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from everyday Christian life in community…may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; for in the poor sister or brother, Christ is knocking at the door." "Since ethical thinking in terms of realms is overcome by faith in the revelation of the ultimate reality in Jesus Christ . . . there is no real Christian existence outside the reality of the world." "People who reject their bodies reject their existence before God the Creator." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer Prelude Andreas Steinhoff [Attribution], via Wikimedia Commons I envisioned having a lot of time for blogging this summer, but that simply has not been the case - the last month has been a crazy one, to say the least. For two weeks, I was working at a theology summer camp of sorts, the Duke Youth Academy, and s
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 1, Day 5

By -
“You Wonder Where the Spirit Went”: Jenson and Barth on the Hiddenness of God By Peter Kline I am entering into a conversation that Jenson has already begun with Barth. In a constructive essay on the hiddenness of God (Jenson 2000), Jenson considers Barth’s position on the matter only to find it lacking. I want to explore why Jenson has problems with Barth on this issue, as well think critically about his constructive alternative. I will suggest that Jenson is only partly right in his diagnosis of Barth; he in fact overlooks the heart of Barth’s teaching on divine hiddenness. The reason is that he looks in the wrong place for Barth’s pneumatology. Jenson can’t find the Spirit in Barth not because the Spirit isn’t there, but because the Spirit is hidden . These considerations will open out into a comparison of Barth and Jenson on the logic of revelation. By “logic” I mean: what is discourse about God’s revealedness and hiddenness supposed to accomplish? Part I Jenson focuses his a
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 3, Day 1

By -
On the Monstrosity of Christ : Karl Barth in Conversation with Slavoj Žižek & John Milbank By Paul Dafydd Jones For a while, I hoped to frame this conversation in terms of a dramatic interchange – something along the lines of “A Slovenian philosopher, a British theologian, and a Swiss dogmatician walk into a bar…” Alongside an eye-wateringly hip assemblage of cinematic references, literary allusions, and comedic scenes – my early favorites being when Barth imagines a young adult novel, entitled Are you there God? It’s me, Žižek , and when Milbank waxes poetic about the Twilight movies – I wanted to engage some topics that would likely receive attention, were the authors to meet for drinks. Primarily, I envisioned an intense discussion of the logos asarkos and the logos ensarkos , with Milbank talking up the former category, Barth emphasizing the latter, and Žižek asking whether recent debates are but symptoms of secret puzzle, embedded in the Church Dogmatics – a puzzle that
Keep reading

Karl Barth on Hell, the Devil, Demons, and Universalism – A Florilegium

By -
Image
You know, all the most interesting topics. Although Barth often confessed that he didn’t find these questions particularly interesting. At best they might draw sideways glances, as it were, as one travels the theological road. But I found a number of places in the records of Barth’s later conversations that I thought folks might find interesting, so I’ve collected them here. And if you aren’t familiar with the term “florilegium,” here you go ! All these texts are from the first volume of Barth in Conversation , with pages numbers given in parentheses along the way. As usual, italics are in the text and bold is mine. Hell “Now we come to hell. You shouldn’t laugh! There is nothing to laugh at! What does hell mean? I think hell means to be in the place where you are once fore all damned and lost without ceasing to exist, without losing the image of God, being what you are but being damned and lost, separated from God, whose creature you are, separated also from your neighbor, from
Keep reading