Top 10 Posts from the Second Half of 2013

By -
Once again it is that lovely time of year when we look back to see what posts you, gentle readers, have been reading over the past six months. I enjoy these opportunities to take stock and see what sorts of material resonates with folks, or brings folks to the blog. Not that this in any way dictates the kind of material that gets put on here – I have little enough time to blog at all, much less to worry about blogging for the sake of some abstract and statistically generated “readership.” But it is interesting, none the less, to get some sense of what “hits” and what “misses.” In any case, here’s the standard disclaimer before we begin:
Standard disclaimer: my metrics in compiling this cannot account for views a post receives when it is read from the main blog page; it can only account for direct views. So it is altogether possible that this list is fallible (*gasps!).
So, without further ado...
  1. Why I Think…Ben Myers Isn’t Quite Right About TF Torrance - This post persistently tops these lists. In fact, it has been securely lodged in the #1 spot ever since I started doing these lists. I’m not sure why this post is so beloved? (Feel free to weigh in with your thoughts on that in the comments section…) Is it because it talks about Ben Myers? Is it because it talks about Tom Torrance? Is it because I say Ben Myers is wrong (well, technically, “not quite right”) about something? Did I just magically hit the SEO jackpot? Maybe we’ll never know…
  2. ‘Most Interesting Theologians’ Twitter Bonanza - This is a much fresher post that chronicles what was a very fun afternoon an evening spent on the interwebs with my good friend, colleague, and theologically-conjoined twin, David Congdon. Some other folks got in on it too. Be sure to check this one out if you haven’t already and, even if you have, a second look might be good for another laugh or two.
  3. So, You Want To Read Karl Barth? - This is another post that persistently makes it onto this list. It’s from 2007, so maybe it needs some updating. Undoubtedly, this book should definitely be on the list…
  4. More on “Grace in Practice”: Schleiermacher, Barth, and Zahl on an Anthropological Starting Point for Theology - This post came from DET contributor Matthew Warren. The title, I think, reveals why it was so popular among DET readers (i.e., it tackles the sort of theological issues and thinkers that DET readers are interested in). Hey Matt, how about a few more like this? ;-)
  5. On Reading and Not-Reading Barth - This post received attention not because of anything it says, but because of the conversation that it pointed to. If you missed that conversation when it occurred, you should definitely go back and familiarize yourself.
  6. Disliking a Hero: Assessing Brevard Childs after Seminary - A guest post by Collin Cornell - I’ve really appreciated Collin’s guest posts, as well as all the work he does at his own blog (Kaleidobible). Apparently, so do you, gentle readers, and that heartens me.
  7. Karl Barth on the Idolatry of God’s Wrath - This post saw a rather extensive (by recent standards) exchange of comments, so it might be worth going to see what all the fuss was about.
  8. Book Giveaway Contest! “The Westminster Handbook to Karl Barth” - This post is so recent that I’m surprised it made the list. I’m glad folks are reading it, though. For those of you out of the loop, DET is giving away a book! Go read the post for details on how you might get on the receiving end of that.
  9. Demythologizing the Divide between Barth and Bultmann - This post by the aforementioned David Congdon, written for the 2008 KBBC, always performs well. David’s dissertation, which deals with Barth and Bultmann, will be defended in a few weeks.
  10. God and the gods: The theological fruitfulness of a history-of-religions approach - A guest post by Collin Cornell - Another post by Collin. I found this to be a very stimulating post and I’m glad that you, gentle readers, did as well.
Well, that’s it!

What are some posts that you think deserved to be on this list but didn't make it?

I can’t wait to see what the next top-10 list will hold. Thanks for reading! Tell your friends, etc.

==================================

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?

By -
Image
Every now and then I am asked for advice about studying Karl Barth. So, I thought that I would share some of my standard advice here. But, before I do that, let me just say that I am by no means a Barth expert as compared to the people whose books I will mention below. I would be thrilled to find myself in their league one day, but as of yet that remains a distant dream. Still, I have been reading Barth for long enough, and under the supervision of a number of the scholars that I will mention below, that I think I can provide a decent orientation. I have never read Karl Barth before. Which of his books should I read first? Barth’s most famous work is the monumental 13-volume Church Dogmatics . Reading the CD with understanding is not an easy thing, so you definitely do NOT want to start here. Luckily, there are two smaller works by Barth that serve as helpful introductions to his work. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction - Based on the lectures that Barth delivered duri
Keep reading

So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer?

By -
Image
"I fear that Christians who stand with only one leg upon earth also stand with only one leg in heaven." "The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from everyday Christian life in community…may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; for in the poor sister or brother, Christ is knocking at the door." "Since ethical thinking in terms of realms is overcome by faith in the revelation of the ultimate reality in Jesus Christ . . . there is no real Christian existence outside the reality of the world." "People who reject their bodies reject their existence before God the Creator." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer Prelude Andreas Steinhoff [Attribution], via Wikimedia Commons I envisioned having a lot of time for blogging this summer, but that simply has not been the case - the last month has been a crazy one, to say the least. For two weeks, I was working at a theology summer camp of sorts, the Duke Youth Academy, and s
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 1, Day 5

By -
“You Wonder Where the Spirit Went”: Jenson and Barth on the Hiddenness of God By Peter Kline I am entering into a conversation that Jenson has already begun with Barth. In a constructive essay on the hiddenness of God (Jenson 2000), Jenson considers Barth’s position on the matter only to find it lacking. I want to explore why Jenson has problems with Barth on this issue, as well think critically about his constructive alternative. I will suggest that Jenson is only partly right in his diagnosis of Barth; he in fact overlooks the heart of Barth’s teaching on divine hiddenness. The reason is that he looks in the wrong place for Barth’s pneumatology. Jenson can’t find the Spirit in Barth not because the Spirit isn’t there, but because the Spirit is hidden . These considerations will open out into a comparison of Barth and Jenson on the logic of revelation. By “logic” I mean: what is discourse about God’s revealedness and hiddenness supposed to accomplish? Part I Jenson focuses his a
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 3, Day 1

By -
On the Monstrosity of Christ : Karl Barth in Conversation with Slavoj Žižek & John Milbank By Paul Dafydd Jones For a while, I hoped to frame this conversation in terms of a dramatic interchange – something along the lines of “A Slovenian philosopher, a British theologian, and a Swiss dogmatician walk into a bar…” Alongside an eye-wateringly hip assemblage of cinematic references, literary allusions, and comedic scenes – my early favorites being when Barth imagines a young adult novel, entitled Are you there God? It’s me, Žižek , and when Milbank waxes poetic about the Twilight movies – I wanted to engage some topics that would likely receive attention, were the authors to meet for drinks. Primarily, I envisioned an intense discussion of the logos asarkos and the logos ensarkos , with Milbank talking up the former category, Barth emphasizing the latter, and Žižek asking whether recent debates are but symptoms of secret puzzle, embedded in the Church Dogmatics – a puzzle that
Keep reading

Karl Barth on Hell, the Devil, Demons, and Universalism – A Florilegium

By -
Image
You know, all the most interesting topics. Although Barth often confessed that he didn’t find these questions particularly interesting. At best they might draw sideways glances, as it were, as one travels the theological road. But I found a number of places in the records of Barth’s later conversations that I thought folks might find interesting, so I’ve collected them here. And if you aren’t familiar with the term “florilegium,” here you go ! All these texts are from the first volume of Barth in Conversation , with pages numbers given in parentheses along the way. As usual, italics are in the text and bold is mine. Hell “Now we come to hell. You shouldn’t laugh! There is nothing to laugh at! What does hell mean? I think hell means to be in the place where you are once fore all damned and lost without ceasing to exist, without losing the image of God, being what you are but being damned and lost, separated from God, whose creature you are, separated also from your neighbor, from
Keep reading