Barth, Anselm, and Analogy
(Ed. note: given that Keith's book was recently reissued in paperback , making it far more affordable, it seemed like a good time to post this...) This is a particularly good footnote from Keith Johnson on a proper understanding of the place Barth’s Anselm book plays in Barth’s theology, in continuity with McCormack and contra von Balthasar. Although undermining HUvB’s pictures of Barth’s development does not put the final nail in the coffin of the popular picture on Barth and the analogy of being (that he didn’t understand it, that he changed his mind about it, etc.), it does (or ought to) at least shift the burden of proof off of opponents of the popular picture, and onto its proponents. As usual, bold is mine and italics are original to the text. Keith L. Johnson, Karl Barth and the Analogia entis, T&T Clark Studies in Systematic Theology (London; T&T Clark, 2010). This book [Barth’s Anselm book] plays an important role in von Balthasar’s reading of Barth, as he l...