Authoritarian Logic and the Transition from Aquinas to Ockham
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhiaQ002oKd21HAAejG8vT2s0ZqdzZg18kXsCTOpMz0B6uESh_tCi4biSxYNtgDJYkHgG-L6lBcmACFlhs1HN6O2Bgj_HSvujze9y5uTvO6goOwYcxkyLvSo6hsiFAu7Jc7eT9iznS48bqt9pY0q4TALD3rbGXQVozKFsl1veupmY8ftWntpqY/s400/41svk7GwCqL._AC_SY780_.jpg)
I'm not generally the sort to be found reading spiritual texts. Hence it is somewhat surprising that I've recently co-edited a volume on Karl Barth's spiritual writings . But, as luck / fate / providence would have it, I recently dug out of the to-read pile this volume on acedia . Demythologized (as it were), we're really talking about reflections on the meaningfulness of life and especially about how it can be challenging to find it meaningful. For whatever reason, I read this in the space of two afternoons with temperatures hanging around triple digits in Central Missouri while in the middle of a week of outdoor living at Boy Scout camp. What follows is a passage that jumped out at me. As usual, italics are original to the text and bold is mine. Jean-Charles Nault, O.S.B., The Noonday Devil: Acedia, The Unnamed Evil of Our Times (Ignatius Press, 2015), pp. 99–101. Ockham views freedom as the exercise of spontaneous and arbitrary will out of a posture of true in