2010 KBBC: Week 3, Outline and Biographical Information

By -
So, we're back for the third and final week-long session of the 2010 Karl Barth Blog Conference (KBBC). For the full story, be sure to read the 2010 KBBC Welcome and Introduction. Here are the key points:

  1. The overarching theme is ”Karl Barth in Conversation with…”, where the blank is filled by some significant thinker or field. This session puts Barth into conversation with more philosophically inclined modern thinkers, although a number of them could also be classified as theologians.
  2. The first two sessions were awesome! Check them out here , or use the KBBC tab at the top of the page to access all the material from the past four years of Karl Barth Blog Conferences.
  3. This is the last session, and your last chance to join in the conversation.
  4. We’re making this into a book! Please donate via PayPal, or order a book through our Amazon Associates account (widget in the right side-bar). If you need to buy something from Amazon, just surf over through our widget and we'll get a kickback!

See you all in the comments section, starting again tomorrow!

Outline
  • Tuesday: Barth in Conversation with Milbank and Zizek on the Atonement, Paul Jones (plenary), Adam Kotsko (reponse).
  • Wednesday: Barth in Conversation with Badiou, Michael Jimenez (plenary), Geoffrey Holsclaw (response).
  • Thursday: Barth in Conversation with D. B. Hart, Keith Starkenburg (plenary), Han-luen Kantzer Komline (response).
  • Friday: Barth in Conversation with Taubes, Ben Myers (plenary), Derek Woodard-Lehman (response).
Biographical Information

Geoffrey Holsclaw is a co-pastor at Life on the Vine, a missional church in NW Chicago, a doctoral candidate at Marquette University focusing on theology and society, and blogs at For the Time Being. His research interests are liturgy and politics in a more continental key, along with studying Augustine. Geoffrey studied philosophy at UC, Santa Cruz, and theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School.

Michael Jimenez received his BA in History at Biola University, and his MA in Theology at Fuller Theological Seminary. He is currently working on a PhD in Theology at Fuller with an emphasis on Karl Barth and his social-political thought in conversation with postmodern theory. Research interests include figures like Karl Barth, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Slavoj Žižek, Gilles Deleuze and Jon Sobrino. He blogs with his brother at I Want a Third Pill.

Paul Dafydd Jones is Assistant Professor of Western Religious Thought at the University of Virginia. He is the author of The Humanity of Christ: Christology in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics (London: T&T Clark, 2008), along with various essays and articles.

Han-luen Kantzer Komline, a graduate of Wheaton College (BA) and Princeton Theological Seminary (MDiv), is currently a doctoral student at the University of Notre Dame where she studies early and modern Christian theology.

Adam Kotsko holds a PhD from the Chicago Theological Seminary and is currently visiting assistant professor of religion at Kalamazoo College. He is the author of Zizek and Theology, and Politics of Redemption: The Social Logic of Salvation. He blogs at An und für sich.

Ben Myers is Lecturer in Systematic Theology at Charles Sturt University in Sydney, Australia. He likes reading novels, drinking coffee, watching Audrey Hepburn, and blogging at Faith and Theology. He also has a new book coming out soon: Christ the Stranger: The Theology of Rowan Williams.

Keith Starkenburg teaches at Trinity Christian College in Palos Heights, IL. He is a PhD candidate in Religious Studies at the University of Virginia and is working on a dissertation which examines connections between Karl Barth’s doctrine of glory and his ecclesiology.

Derek Woodard-Lehman holds degrees from Messiah College and Duke University, and is currently a doctoral student at Princeton Theological Seminary in Religion and Society. He recently received second prize of the 2010 Goodwin Prize for Excellence in Theological Writing, hosted by Theological Horizons, with his essay: “Radical Protestant, Radical Democrat: Cornel West and the Possibility of Public Theology.”

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?

By -
Image
Every now and then I am asked for advice about studying Karl Barth. So, I thought that I would share some of my standard advice here. But, before I do that, let me just say that I am by no means a Barth expert as compared to the people whose books I will mention below. I would be thrilled to find myself in their league one day, but as of yet that remains a distant dream. Still, I have been reading Barth for long enough, and under the supervision of a number of the scholars that I will mention below, that I think I can provide a decent orientation. I have never read Karl Barth before. Which of his books should I read first? Barth’s most famous work is the monumental 13-volume Church Dogmatics . Reading the CD with understanding is not an easy thing, so you definitely do NOT want to start here. Luckily, there are two smaller works by Barth that serve as helpful introductions to his work. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction - Based on the lectures that Barth delivered duri
Keep reading

So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer?

By -
Image
"I fear that Christians who stand with only one leg upon earth also stand with only one leg in heaven." "The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from everyday Christian life in community…may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; for in the poor sister or brother, Christ is knocking at the door." "Since ethical thinking in terms of realms is overcome by faith in the revelation of the ultimate reality in Jesus Christ . . . there is no real Christian existence outside the reality of the world." "People who reject their bodies reject their existence before God the Creator." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer Prelude Andreas Steinhoff [Attribution], via Wikimedia Commons I envisioned having a lot of time for blogging this summer, but that simply has not been the case - the last month has been a crazy one, to say the least. For two weeks, I was working at a theology summer camp of sorts, the Duke Youth Academy, and s
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 1, Day 5

By -
“You Wonder Where the Spirit Went”: Jenson and Barth on the Hiddenness of God By Peter Kline I am entering into a conversation that Jenson has already begun with Barth. In a constructive essay on the hiddenness of God (Jenson 2000), Jenson considers Barth’s position on the matter only to find it lacking. I want to explore why Jenson has problems with Barth on this issue, as well think critically about his constructive alternative. I will suggest that Jenson is only partly right in his diagnosis of Barth; he in fact overlooks the heart of Barth’s teaching on divine hiddenness. The reason is that he looks in the wrong place for Barth’s pneumatology. Jenson can’t find the Spirit in Barth not because the Spirit isn’t there, but because the Spirit is hidden . These considerations will open out into a comparison of Barth and Jenson on the logic of revelation. By “logic” I mean: what is discourse about God’s revealedness and hiddenness supposed to accomplish? Part I Jenson focuses his a
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 3, Day 1

By -
On the Monstrosity of Christ : Karl Barth in Conversation with Slavoj Žižek & John Milbank By Paul Dafydd Jones For a while, I hoped to frame this conversation in terms of a dramatic interchange – something along the lines of “A Slovenian philosopher, a British theologian, and a Swiss dogmatician walk into a bar…” Alongside an eye-wateringly hip assemblage of cinematic references, literary allusions, and comedic scenes – my early favorites being when Barth imagines a young adult novel, entitled Are you there God? It’s me, Žižek , and when Milbank waxes poetic about the Twilight movies – I wanted to engage some topics that would likely receive attention, were the authors to meet for drinks. Primarily, I envisioned an intense discussion of the logos asarkos and the logos ensarkos , with Milbank talking up the former category, Barth emphasizing the latter, and Žižek asking whether recent debates are but symptoms of secret puzzle, embedded in the Church Dogmatics – a puzzle that
Keep reading

Karl Barth on Hell, the Devil, Demons, and Universalism – A Florilegium

By -
Image
You know, all the most interesting topics. Although Barth often confessed that he didn’t find these questions particularly interesting. At best they might draw sideways glances, as it were, as one travels the theological road. But I found a number of places in the records of Barth’s later conversations that I thought folks might find interesting, so I’ve collected them here. And if you aren’t familiar with the term “florilegium,” here you go ! All these texts are from the first volume of Barth in Conversation , with pages numbers given in parentheses along the way. As usual, italics are in the text and bold is mine. Hell “Now we come to hell. You shouldn’t laugh! There is nothing to laugh at! What does hell mean? I think hell means to be in the place where you are once fore all damned and lost without ceasing to exist, without losing the image of God, being what you are but being damned and lost, separated from God, whose creature you are, separated also from your neighbor, from
Keep reading