Top 10 DET Posts of 2018

By -
I have been casting my mind back, gentle readers, as I am wont to do, over the previous year here at DET. That I have been doing this in March rather than in January is, I think, evidence of how absolutely swamped I’ve been with other professional demands.

And, no. Sadly, I don’t mean the demands of new writing and research projects, as much as I wish that were the case. Luckily for all of us, I have it on good authority that David Congdon is still managing to stitch together subjects and verbs, perhaps even sprinkling in the odd participle from time to time, so we will just have to look forward to what he will give us in good time.

Meanwhile, I have been basting my mind back, gentle readers, as…oh, wait, said that already. Sorry.

Here’s the annual post on the most trafficked (fair warning: traffic was not counted in an especially scientific way) posts over the previous year. If you’re curious, here’s the list from 2017.

DET 2018 Top 10

  1. So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer? - Coming in at #4 last year, this post saw a major upswing to snag the top spot in 2018. If you see the author on Twitter (@brandy_daniels), be sure to stop and say hello.
  2. So, You Want To Read Karl Barth? - This post is a perennial favorite, coming in second for the second year in a row.
  3. Abortion, Authoritarian Self-Deception, Evangelicals, and Trump: a collected Twitter essay from Christopher Stroop - Last year’s #1 slips down to #3, but you definitely need to read it if you haven’t yet. In fact, you should read it again if you haven’t read it in the last month or two. And be sure to keep track of the author on Twitter (@C_Stroop).
  4. "Jesus was a failure" - an anonymous missive on the possibility of faith in the modern world - This is the first post in our list actually written in 2018, and #4 is a very respectable first-year showing.
  5. Types of Theology - This post is over a decade old now, and it’s such a blunt instrument that I’m beginning to get a little embarrassed about it. I’m at a loss as to why folks got interested in it again in 2018.
  6. Demythologizing the Divide between Barth and Bultmann - Here we have another perennial favorite that provides a glimpse into some of the earlier days of David Congdon’s work on Bultmann. It slipped a place from its #5 finish last year, and it has come in significantly higher than that in previous years. It is definitely worth your time to read it, whether again or for the first time!
  7. “We must become the prayer”: an anonymous missive on the pastoral task after the death of God - DET published two anonymous missives in 2018, and both of them made the list. Inquiring minds want to know! But seriously, this is thought-provoking stuff on which you should definitely reflect.
  8. What’s the Deal with Wolfhart Pannenberg? A guest post by Andrew Hollingsworth - This guest post on Pannenberg seems to have scratched some folks where they itched. Be kind, and keep track of Andrew on Twitter (@andrewh_mc11).
  9. Rudolf Otto, Rudolf Bultmann, and the “Wholly Other” - I had completely forgotten about this post until it popped up on the list this year. More evidence of a Bultmann renaissance? Or is Otto poised to make a comeback?
  10. TF Torrance on Evangelism and How to Preach the Gospel - Don’t call it a comeback! Well, ok. Maybe you can call it a comeback. Whatever it is, this post is even older than the Types of Theology post. Or maybe folks just needed a dose of TF Torrance.

So there’s our list! Here are some honorable mentions selected on the very rigorous criteria of…being posts that I wanted to highlight.

Honorable mention


==================================


Subscribe to Die Evangelischen Theologen

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?

By -
Image
Every now and then I am asked for advice about studying Karl Barth. So, I thought that I would share some of my standard advice here. But, before I do that, let me just say that I am by no means a Barth expert as compared to the people whose books I will mention below. I would be thrilled to find myself in their league one day, but as of yet that remains a distant dream. Still, I have been reading Barth for long enough, and under the supervision of a number of the scholars that I will mention below, that I think I can provide a decent orientation. I have never read Karl Barth before. Which of his books should I read first? Barth’s most famous work is the monumental 13-volume Church Dogmatics . Reading the CD with understanding is not an easy thing, so you definitely do NOT want to start here. Luckily, there are two smaller works by Barth that serve as helpful introductions to his work. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction - Based on the lectures that Barth delivered duri
Keep reading

So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer?

By -
Image
"I fear that Christians who stand with only one leg upon earth also stand with only one leg in heaven." "The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from everyday Christian life in community…may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; for in the poor sister or brother, Christ is knocking at the door." "Since ethical thinking in terms of realms is overcome by faith in the revelation of the ultimate reality in Jesus Christ . . . there is no real Christian existence outside the reality of the world." "People who reject their bodies reject their existence before God the Creator." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer Prelude Andreas Steinhoff [Attribution], via Wikimedia Commons I envisioned having a lot of time for blogging this summer, but that simply has not been the case - the last month has been a crazy one, to say the least. For two weeks, I was working at a theology summer camp of sorts, the Duke Youth Academy, and s
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 1, Day 5

By -
“You Wonder Where the Spirit Went”: Jenson and Barth on the Hiddenness of God By Peter Kline I am entering into a conversation that Jenson has already begun with Barth. In a constructive essay on the hiddenness of God (Jenson 2000), Jenson considers Barth’s position on the matter only to find it lacking. I want to explore why Jenson has problems with Barth on this issue, as well think critically about his constructive alternative. I will suggest that Jenson is only partly right in his diagnosis of Barth; he in fact overlooks the heart of Barth’s teaching on divine hiddenness. The reason is that he looks in the wrong place for Barth’s pneumatology. Jenson can’t find the Spirit in Barth not because the Spirit isn’t there, but because the Spirit is hidden . These considerations will open out into a comparison of Barth and Jenson on the logic of revelation. By “logic” I mean: what is discourse about God’s revealedness and hiddenness supposed to accomplish? Part I Jenson focuses his a
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 3, Day 1

By -
On the Monstrosity of Christ : Karl Barth in Conversation with Slavoj Žižek & John Milbank By Paul Dafydd Jones For a while, I hoped to frame this conversation in terms of a dramatic interchange – something along the lines of “A Slovenian philosopher, a British theologian, and a Swiss dogmatician walk into a bar…” Alongside an eye-wateringly hip assemblage of cinematic references, literary allusions, and comedic scenes – my early favorites being when Barth imagines a young adult novel, entitled Are you there God? It’s me, Žižek , and when Milbank waxes poetic about the Twilight movies – I wanted to engage some topics that would likely receive attention, were the authors to meet for drinks. Primarily, I envisioned an intense discussion of the logos asarkos and the logos ensarkos , with Milbank talking up the former category, Barth emphasizing the latter, and Žižek asking whether recent debates are but symptoms of secret puzzle, embedded in the Church Dogmatics – a puzzle that
Keep reading

Karl Barth on Hell, the Devil, Demons, and Universalism – A Florilegium

By -
Image
You know, all the most interesting topics. Although Barth often confessed that he didn’t find these questions particularly interesting. At best they might draw sideways glances, as it were, as one travels the theological road. But I found a number of places in the records of Barth’s later conversations that I thought folks might find interesting, so I’ve collected them here. And if you aren’t familiar with the term “florilegium,” here you go ! All these texts are from the first volume of Barth in Conversation , with pages numbers given in parentheses along the way. As usual, italics are in the text and bold is mine. Hell “Now we come to hell. You shouldn’t laugh! There is nothing to laugh at! What does hell mean? I think hell means to be in the place where you are once fore all damned and lost without ceasing to exist, without losing the image of God, being what you are but being damned and lost, separated from God, whose creature you are, separated also from your neighbor, from
Keep reading