A Peace that Disturbs: Berrigan's Restless Spirituality

By -
"Christ Driving the Money-Changers from the Temple,”
by Theodoor Rombouts, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
So Lent (for those who observe it) is about getting one’s inner spiritual house tidied up first so that one might be a more effective disciple and social justice warrior, right?

Wrong! Daniel Berrigan, at least, would have demurred.

I’m embarrassed to admit I’ve never really read this notorious Jesuit poet and radical peace activist, so I’m trying to rectify this neglect and make a fresh start during this penitential season of new beginnings by engaging this anthology from Orbis’ superb Modern Spiritual Masters Series. Berrigan (1921-2016), a critically acclaimed poet and biblical interpreter who wrote around 50 books, earned international notoriety -- and FBI surveillance! -- in the 1960s through his trenchant critiques and prophetic actions against the war in Southeast Asia. In 1968, the tumultous year that witnessed the assassinations of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert Kennedy, Berrigan travelled to Vietnam with historian Howard Zinn, where they managed to secure the release of several U.S. prisoners of war. Several months later, he joined eight other activists in Catonsville, Maryland, in burning draft records with home-made napalm, a deed for which he served two years in federal prison. In 1980 he was arrested with his brother Phillip and other members of "Plowshares Eight" group who defaced an unarmed nuclear warhead at a federal facility in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. Throughout the following decades, both brothers were arrested many times for such acts protesting and resisting the military-industrial complex. For Daniel Berrigan, matters of conscience brooked no compromise.

Daniel Berrigan: Essential Writings, Selected with an Introduction by John Dear (Orbis, 2009).

In his warm and bracing introduction to the life and thought of his friend, John Dear shares a few provocative Berrigan quotes, on the topic of "spirituality," culled from a 25-year-old article (“Daniel Berrigan on Contemporary Developments in American Spirituality” Tikkun 13, no. 5, Sept./Oct. 1998, p. 48). (Unfortunately, the article is not available on the magazine’s online archive, so for now I’ll have to be content with quoting it at one remove.) In this passage, Berrigan offers strong tonic against any conception of the spiritual life that strives for inner harmony through mute passivity or solipsistic navel-gazing:

”Some people today argue that equanimity achieved through inner spiritual work is a necessary condition for sustaining one’s ethical and political commitments,” Dan writes. “But to the prophets of the Bible, this would have been an absolutely foreign language and a foreign view of the human. The notion that one has to achieve peace of mind before stretching out one’s hand to one’s neighbor is a distortion of our human experience and ultimately a dodge of our responsibility.” (p. 30).

Here’s my gloss: It’s high time for believers to count the inner turmoil that comes from identifying with the hopes and struggles of an often brutal and violent world, a brutality and a violence that we confront inside ourselves every bit as much as it is out there.

Berrigan continues:

”Life is roller coaster, and one had better buckle one’s belt and take the trip. This focus on equanimity is actually a narrow-minded, selfish approach to reality dressed up within the language of spirituality” (ibid.)

Is Berrigan being a bit too harsh here? After all, it seems to me, the desire for inner peace is not intrinsically wrong per se. Still, the Jesuit poet eschews the still-current fashion of retrieving this or that bit of the contemplative tradition – or, at least, some of the more facile and commodified appropriations from that spiritual heritage. Moreover, in addition to rebuking our penchant for individualism, Berrigan takes on another sacred cows of our North American religious heritage – namely, our results-oriented pragmatism. In other words, sometimes you have to do what’s right simply because it’s right, no matter the consequences.

”I know that the prophetic vision is not popular today in some spiritual circles,” he continues. “But our task is not to be popular or to be seen as having an impact, but to speak the deepest truths that we know. We need to live our lives in accord with the deepest truths we know, even if doing so does not produce immediate results in the world” (p. 31).
.
These comments remind me of the final book (or, if you prefer, screed) published by William Stringfellow, one of Berrigan's very close friends -- The Politics of Spirituality (1984), which tackles some of the spiritual kitsch and idolotries of the Reagan years. But, as I don’t want to wear out my welcome any further here, I’ll defer taking up that book for another day.

==================================



Subscribe to Die Evangelischen Theologen

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer?

By -
Image
"I fear that Christians who stand with only one leg upon earth also stand with only one leg in heaven." "The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from everyday Christian life in community…may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; for in the poor sister or brother, Christ is knocking at the door." "Since ethical thinking in terms of realms is overcome by faith in the revelation of the ultimate reality in Jesus Christ . . . there is no real Christian existence outside the reality of the world." "People who reject their bodies reject their existence before God the Creator." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer Prelude Andreas Steinhoff [Attribution], via Wikimedia Commons I envisioned having a lot of time for blogging this summer, but that simply has not been the case - the last month has been a crazy one, to say the least. For two weeks, I was working at a theology summer camp of sorts, the Duke Youth Academy, and s...
Keep reading

So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?

By -
Image
Every now and then I am asked for advice about studying Karl Barth. So, I thought that I would share some of my standard advice here. But, before I do that, let me just say that I am by no means a Barth expert as compared to the people whose books I will mention below. I would be thrilled to find myself in their league one day, but as of yet that remains a distant dream. Still, I have been reading Barth for long enough, and under the supervision of a number of the scholars that I will mention below, that I think I can provide a decent orientation. I have never read Karl Barth before. Which of his books should I read first? Barth’s most famous work is the monumental 13-volume Church Dogmatics . Reading the CD with understanding is not an easy thing, so you definitely do NOT want to start here. Luckily, there are two smaller works by Barth that serve as helpful introductions to his work. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction - Based on the lectures that Barth delivered duri...
Keep reading

Karl Barth on Hell, the Devil, Demons, and Universalism – A Florilegium

By -
Image
You know, all the most interesting topics. Although Barth often confessed that he didn’t find these questions particularly interesting. At best they might draw sideways glances, as it were, as one travels the theological road. But I found a number of places in the records of Barth’s later conversations that I thought folks might find interesting, so I’ve collected them here. And if you aren’t familiar with the term “florilegium,” here you go ! All these texts are from the first volume of Barth in Conversation , with pages numbers given in parentheses along the way. As usual, italics are in the text and bold is mine. Hell “Now we come to hell. You shouldn’t laugh! There is nothing to laugh at! What does hell mean? I think hell means to be in the place where you are once fore all damned and lost without ceasing to exist, without losing the image of God, being what you are but being damned and lost, separated from God, whose creature you are, separated also from your neighbor, from...
Keep reading

George Hunsinger’s gloss of the Christ Hymn in Philippians 2

By -
Image
I’ve been reading George Hunsinger’s (my doktorvater , for anyone who might be new around here) entry in the Brazos Theoloical Commentary on the Bible series on Philippians. Anyone who has studied with George will find this book to be a compendium and application of many of his most characteristic and beloved analytical tools and patterns, and I’ve been enjoying it immensely. But one of the things that really stood out to me was how he glossed the so-called “Christ hymn” of Philippians 2. George Hunsinger, Philippians , Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible (Grand Rapids: BrazosPress, 2020). The gloss that Hunsinger provides is not a historical-critical interpretation. Rather, it is an ecclesial, ecumenical, and theological interpretation that attempts to fill in the blanks for how to understand this proto-liturgical formulation in light of the later formulations of the ecumenical creeds. In order to achieve this gloss, Hunsinger engages in “ecclesial hermeneutics” and makes “...
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 3, Day 1

By -
On the Monstrosity of Christ : Karl Barth in Conversation with Slavoj Žižek & John Milbank By Paul Dafydd Jones For a while, I hoped to frame this conversation in terms of a dramatic interchange – something along the lines of “A Slovenian philosopher, a British theologian, and a Swiss dogmatician walk into a bar…” Alongside an eye-wateringly hip assemblage of cinematic references, literary allusions, and comedic scenes – my early favorites being when Barth imagines a young adult novel, entitled Are you there God? It’s me, Žižek , and when Milbank waxes poetic about the Twilight movies – I wanted to engage some topics that would likely receive attention, were the authors to meet for drinks. Primarily, I envisioned an intense discussion of the logos asarkos and the logos ensarkos , with Milbank talking up the former category, Barth emphasizing the latter, and Žižek asking whether recent debates are but symptoms of secret puzzle, embedded in the Church Dogmatics – a puzzle that...
Keep reading