Celebrate 5000 downloads for The McKrakenCast!

By -
Those of you, gentle readers, who have been here before will undoubtedly be aware that I have a small podcasting venture, entitled—The McKrakenCast. It is a modest venture, but I enjoy having an outlet for the spoken word in addition to the written word.

I’m pleased to share with you that The McKrakenCast has now surpassed 5000 downloads! I know this isn’t a particularly large number in the grand scheme of things, but I’m rather proud of this modest milestone.

So, in honor of the day, I wanted to share with you two lists—first, a top 5 from the podcast’s first 5k downloads; second, a top 5 “podcaster’s choice” deep cuts from the podcast’s catalog.

Top 5 Episodes
  1. Part 1 - Scots Confession, History & Theology
  2. Barth's "Göttingen Dogmatics" - Introduction
  3. Barth's "Göttingen Dogmatics" - §1: The Word of God as the Problem of Dogmatics
  4. Karl Barth: Spiritual Writings - A conversation with the editors
  5. Barth's "Göttingen Dogmatics" - §3: Deus Dixit (“God has spoken”)
I see a bit of a trend above. As is generally the case, my work on Barth generates the greatest interest.

Podcaster’s Choice Deep Cuts
  1. Scots Confession Series—since the #1 spot above was claimed by the first installment of this series, it only makes sense to highlight the rest of the series for you. I have rather a soft spot for this material.
  2. I don’t preach very often at all, but I did twice in the summer of 2024, and I think the sermons turned out halfway decently. Here are two sermons: "Choices" - A Sermon on Ephesians 1, and "Blood" - A Sermon on Ephesians 1:7
  3. Of course, I must highlight some content created with my theologically conjoined twin, David Congdon. Here are two such offerings: Introducing Dialectical Theology, with David Congdon, and Congdon & McMaken - The Torres Interview
  4. As I mentioned above, my work on Barth tends to generate the most interest. I’ve also happened to have the opportunity to engage in some interesting dialogue across the Barthian / Process Theology lines—not least with my Lindenwood University College of Arts and Humanities Colleague, Nichole Torbitzky. Three of those conversations are available on the podcast:
  5. Finally, many of you will be aware that I have a soft spot in my theological heart for John Calvin, and I would be remiss if I did not include some of my content on Calvin in this list. Here are two offerings: Biography of a Calvin Reader (How I Read John Calvin, part 1), and John Calvin and the Natural Knowledge of God (How I Read John Calvin, Part 2)
You can find the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Amazon, as well as on many of your favorite podcasting apps. Thank you all for your ongoing interest, both here at DET and over at The McKrakenCast!

==================================
@wtmcmaken.bsky.social



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer?

By -
Image
"I fear that Christians who stand with only one leg upon earth also stand with only one leg in heaven." "The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from everyday Christian life in community…may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; for in the poor sister or brother, Christ is knocking at the door." "Since ethical thinking in terms of realms is overcome by faith in the revelation of the ultimate reality in Jesus Christ . . . there is no real Christian existence outside the reality of the world." "People who reject their bodies reject their existence before God the Creator." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer Prelude Andreas Steinhoff [Attribution], via Wikimedia Commons I envisioned having a lot of time for blogging this summer, but that simply has not been the case - the last month has been a crazy one, to say the least. For two weeks, I was working at a theology summer camp of sorts, the Duke Youth Academy, and s...
Keep reading

So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?

By -
Image
Every now and then I am asked for advice about studying Karl Barth. So, I thought that I would share some of my standard advice here. But, before I do that, let me just say that I am by no means a Barth expert as compared to the people whose books I will mention below. I would be thrilled to find myself in their league one day, but as of yet that remains a distant dream. Still, I have been reading Barth for long enough, and under the supervision of a number of the scholars that I will mention below, that I think I can provide a decent orientation. I have never read Karl Barth before. Which of his books should I read first? Barth’s most famous work is the monumental 13-volume Church Dogmatics . Reading the CD with understanding is not an easy thing, so you definitely do NOT want to start here. Luckily, there are two smaller works by Barth that serve as helpful introductions to his work. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction - Based on the lectures that Barth delivered duri...
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 3, Day 1

By -
On the Monstrosity of Christ : Karl Barth in Conversation with Slavoj Žižek & John Milbank By Paul Dafydd Jones For a while, I hoped to frame this conversation in terms of a dramatic interchange – something along the lines of “A Slovenian philosopher, a British theologian, and a Swiss dogmatician walk into a bar…” Alongside an eye-wateringly hip assemblage of cinematic references, literary allusions, and comedic scenes – my early favorites being when Barth imagines a young adult novel, entitled Are you there God? It’s me, Žižek , and when Milbank waxes poetic about the Twilight movies – I wanted to engage some topics that would likely receive attention, were the authors to meet for drinks. Primarily, I envisioned an intense discussion of the logos asarkos and the logos ensarkos , with Milbank talking up the former category, Barth emphasizing the latter, and Žižek asking whether recent debates are but symptoms of secret puzzle, embedded in the Church Dogmatics – a puzzle that...
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 1, Day 5

By -
“You Wonder Where the Spirit Went”: Jenson and Barth on the Hiddenness of God By Peter Kline I am entering into a conversation that Jenson has already begun with Barth. In a constructive essay on the hiddenness of God (Jenson 2000), Jenson considers Barth’s position on the matter only to find it lacking. I want to explore why Jenson has problems with Barth on this issue, as well think critically about his constructive alternative. I will suggest that Jenson is only partly right in his diagnosis of Barth; he in fact overlooks the heart of Barth’s teaching on divine hiddenness. The reason is that he looks in the wrong place for Barth’s pneumatology. Jenson can’t find the Spirit in Barth not because the Spirit isn’t there, but because the Spirit is hidden . These considerations will open out into a comparison of Barth and Jenson on the logic of revelation. By “logic” I mean: what is discourse about God’s revealedness and hiddenness supposed to accomplish? Part I Jenson focuses his a...
Keep reading

Karl Barth on Hell, the Devil, Demons, and Universalism – A Florilegium

By -
Image
You know, all the most interesting topics. Although Barth often confessed that he didn’t find these questions particularly interesting. At best they might draw sideways glances, as it were, as one travels the theological road. But I found a number of places in the records of Barth’s later conversations that I thought folks might find interesting, so I’ve collected them here. And if you aren’t familiar with the term “florilegium,” here you go ! All these texts are from the first volume of Barth in Conversation , with pages numbers given in parentheses along the way. As usual, italics are in the text and bold is mine. Hell “Now we come to hell. You shouldn’t laugh! There is nothing to laugh at! What does hell mean? I think hell means to be in the place where you are once fore all damned and lost without ceasing to exist, without losing the image of God, being what you are but being damned and lost, separated from God, whose creature you are, separated also from your neighbor, from...
Keep reading