"Storied Witness: The Theology of Black Women Preachers in 19th-Century America"—by Kate Hanch

By -

I’ve been meaning to post about this book for a couple months now but either the time didn’t seem right or other things got in the way. But I don’t want to delay any longer because folks need to know about this book.

The author, Kate Hanch, is a friend and pastor in town (so please forgive me for using her first name rather than her surname in what follows), and I’ve benefited from pretty regular theological conversations with her for a number of years now. She always brings figures and ideas to the conversation that I haven’t encountered before, or haven’t encountered intensively enough before, and I always walk away feeling that my intellectual horizon has expanded. I can only hope she feels the same way.

 

This book lifts up the lives and witness of three black women preachers from 19th-century American: Zilpha Elaw, Julia Foote, and Sojourner Truth. Of these women, Truth was the only one I had even heard of before meeting Kate, and I’m glad to have had the chance to learn from her about Elaw and Foote, as well as learning a lot more about Truth! Here is one excerpt that focuses on the interconnectedness of the pastoral and the prophetic in these figures (from pp. 150–51; bold is mine):

 

“Elaw, Foote, and Truth perceive the prophetic in the vein of the prophets of the Hebrew Scriptures. They cite these prophets numerous times in their sermons and autobiographies. Hebrew prophets saw themselves as called by God, sent to speak the Word to their communities. Their messages could be directives, pronouncements of judgment or wrath, or even comforting words. … In the Hebrew Scriptures, prophets were not lone individuals but members of the larger community who were accountable to the society. The twentieth-century Jewish Mystic Abraham Heschel perceives the prophetic as siding with the downtrodden, expressing both anger and sympathy: ‘Prophecy is the voice that God has lent to the silent agony, a voice to the plundered.’ The three women, in different ways, body this voice of God to their communities. They all document their experiences of racism and sexism. Sojourner Truth, for example, spoke of the exploitation of her enslaved Black siblings. They make the silent agony visible in their sermons and memoirs.

            Elaw, Foote, and Truth functioned pastorally in that they offered care and support to their audiences and communities, helping people draw closer to God. The sixth-century theologian Gregory the Great, who wrote the first pastoral care manual, describes a good pastor as one who is ‘a near neighbor to every one in sympathy, and exalted above all in contemplation.’ For Gregory, a pastor must both possess good integrity and love of their neighbors. Gregory’s description of a pastor infers that Jesus Christ is the ultimate pastor, who, like a shepherd, cares for his flock by speaking the truth. Jesus as the Good Shepherd loves and protects his flock. Elaw, Foote, and Truth bodied this pastoral presence as well: speaking a prophetic word to oppressors meant promoting the well-being of the downtrodden. The pastoral and prophetic necessarily interconnect for all women.”

 

This book is easy to read but highlights and shares profound, reorienting thoughts from Elaw, Foote, Truth, and Kate as well. I have recommended it both to fellow scholars and to church folks. On the latter note, it can be profitably read in church book clubs or adult education / spiritual formation contexts. And Kate has also prepared a discussion guide—just reach out to her and she will be happy to send it.

 

I hope you’ll pick up a copy of this book. It will be well worth your time. But you don’t have to just take my word for it. Here are some testimonials from other folks as well:  


==================================
Location: St Charles, MO, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

So, You Want To Read Karl Barth?

By -
Image
Every now and then I am asked for advice about studying Karl Barth. So, I thought that I would share some of my standard advice here. But, before I do that, let me just say that I am by no means a Barth expert as compared to the people whose books I will mention below. I would be thrilled to find myself in their league one day, but as of yet that remains a distant dream. Still, I have been reading Barth for long enough, and under the supervision of a number of the scholars that I will mention below, that I think I can provide a decent orientation. I have never read Karl Barth before. Which of his books should I read first? Barth’s most famous work is the monumental 13-volume Church Dogmatics . Reading the CD with understanding is not an easy thing, so you definitely do NOT want to start here. Luckily, there are two smaller works by Barth that serve as helpful introductions to his work. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction - Based on the lectures that Barth delivered duri
Keep reading

So You Want to Read….Dietrich Bonhoeffer?

By -
Image
"I fear that Christians who stand with only one leg upon earth also stand with only one leg in heaven." "The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from everyday Christian life in community…may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; for in the poor sister or brother, Christ is knocking at the door." "Since ethical thinking in terms of realms is overcome by faith in the revelation of the ultimate reality in Jesus Christ . . . there is no real Christian existence outside the reality of the world." "People who reject their bodies reject their existence before God the Creator." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer Prelude Andreas Steinhoff [Attribution], via Wikimedia Commons I envisioned having a lot of time for blogging this summer, but that simply has not been the case - the last month has been a crazy one, to say the least. For two weeks, I was working at a theology summer camp of sorts, the Duke Youth Academy, and s
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 1, Day 5

By -
“You Wonder Where the Spirit Went”: Jenson and Barth on the Hiddenness of God By Peter Kline I am entering into a conversation that Jenson has already begun with Barth. In a constructive essay on the hiddenness of God (Jenson 2000), Jenson considers Barth’s position on the matter only to find it lacking. I want to explore why Jenson has problems with Barth on this issue, as well think critically about his constructive alternative. I will suggest that Jenson is only partly right in his diagnosis of Barth; he in fact overlooks the heart of Barth’s teaching on divine hiddenness. The reason is that he looks in the wrong place for Barth’s pneumatology. Jenson can’t find the Spirit in Barth not because the Spirit isn’t there, but because the Spirit is hidden . These considerations will open out into a comparison of Barth and Jenson on the logic of revelation. By “logic” I mean: what is discourse about God’s revealedness and hiddenness supposed to accomplish? Part I Jenson focuses his a
Keep reading

2010 KBBC: Week 3, Day 1

By -
On the Monstrosity of Christ : Karl Barth in Conversation with Slavoj Žižek & John Milbank By Paul Dafydd Jones For a while, I hoped to frame this conversation in terms of a dramatic interchange – something along the lines of “A Slovenian philosopher, a British theologian, and a Swiss dogmatician walk into a bar…” Alongside an eye-wateringly hip assemblage of cinematic references, literary allusions, and comedic scenes – my early favorites being when Barth imagines a young adult novel, entitled Are you there God? It’s me, Žižek , and when Milbank waxes poetic about the Twilight movies – I wanted to engage some topics that would likely receive attention, were the authors to meet for drinks. Primarily, I envisioned an intense discussion of the logos asarkos and the logos ensarkos , with Milbank talking up the former category, Barth emphasizing the latter, and Žižek asking whether recent debates are but symptoms of secret puzzle, embedded in the Church Dogmatics – a puzzle that
Keep reading

Karl Barth on Hell, the Devil, Demons, and Universalism – A Florilegium

By -
Image
You know, all the most interesting topics. Although Barth often confessed that he didn’t find these questions particularly interesting. At best they might draw sideways glances, as it were, as one travels the theological road. But I found a number of places in the records of Barth’s later conversations that I thought folks might find interesting, so I’ve collected them here. And if you aren’t familiar with the term “florilegium,” here you go ! All these texts are from the first volume of Barth in Conversation , with pages numbers given in parentheses along the way. As usual, italics are in the text and bold is mine. Hell “Now we come to hell. You shouldn’t laugh! There is nothing to laugh at! What does hell mean? I think hell means to be in the place where you are once fore all damned and lost without ceasing to exist, without losing the image of God, being what you are but being damned and lost, separated from God, whose creature you are, separated also from your neighbor, from
Keep reading